This week was consumed with one central theme – Spring Break. Between the chocolate shakes for breakfast and new tracks on Mario Kart – ‘Our Dad is the greatest dad ever!’ – I spent most of my time with my kids, and I loved it. Who needs Disneyworld? We’ve got magic airplanes, dragons, and stainless teeth! Here we go….
#5 Assembled 1261 pieces of a 1297 piece Lego set.
My son and I completed our Lego Cargo Plane and may I say, it is awesome. It has movable wing flaps, elevators, and an electric motor which powers the propellers, retractable landing gear, the cargo bay door in the rear, the cockpit in the front and I think, if you listen close enough, an onboard movie. When I was a kid the coolest thing I ever built with Legos was a wall, and if I was feeling particularly lively that day, a wall with a window. Who came up with all of this? When we bought this set last week I thought that it was way overpriced, but now I’m convinced that it is way underpriced. The level of engineering in this thing is incredible. It has a transmission – a transmission – and yes, we had to assemble it, which was awesome. If Lego ran NASA, we wouldn’t worry about going to Mars (and quite frankly, who cares? Is Obi-Wan Kenobi up there? Will he show us how to make a light saber?), we would just be happy figuring out different ways to take apart and reassemble the Lincoln Memorial. There’s only one problem: we have 36 pieces left. They are small pieces, and I really think they are just spares, but let’s just say I’m glad that I’m not actually flying anywhere on this plane, although, I totally could.
#4 I think my brown-eyed daughter just likes dragons.
So I looked into my daughter’s new ‘boyfriend’ (ugh) and it turns out that this entire episode is so innocent that I may have been a bit over concerned. He’s a nice boy with a crush and she’s a nice girl who likes getting free stuff. It turns out that they both like the movie series How to Eat a Dragon; or maybe it’s How to Feed a Dragon; no, wait, How to Train Your Dragon. Anyway, whatever it is, it was so successful that they made Part 2 because apparently the feeding/training wasn’t complete, sort of like the Free Willy franchise. After the first one, one would think the stupid whale would have learned its lesson, but nooo, it obviously became trapped at least two more times, and if Warner Bros. can wring some more summer movie dollars out of it, I’m sure he’ll caught again. Back to the boyfriend (sorry), he gave her some dragon paraphernalia for Valentine’s Day and she loved it. That’s it. Their ‘relationship’ (ugh) hinges upon Dreamworks’ decision to make more dragon eating movies, which means they’ll be an ‘item’ (ugh) for years to come.
#3 My blue-eyed daughter’s mouth meets foreign substances, and it’s not the braces.
Either my daughter’s threshold of pain is much higher than I suspected or the new braces weren’t as bad as feared. To be fair, she only had the top set put on, so it could have been a lot worse. Her biggest problem is varying her diet. Twix and taffy are out, not-Twix and not-taffy foods are in. This will be an opportunity to open her horizons, because thus far, unless it comes from a box or a drive-thru window, she doesn’t like it. But it’s not like she’s overweight. In fact, she’s about as wide as a coat of paint, but she doesn’t like any home-cooked meals. Of course I’ve appealed to her southern roots and told her that it is her obligation to like greens and iced tea and lard, but she won’t have anything to do with it. At least her teeth will be straight and will match the rest of her.
#2 I’m convinced more than ever that Robert Johnson sold his soul to the devil.
I tried, I really did.
Robert Johnson’s music was written and recorded in the early twentieth century and sounds like it was recorded on a tin can. So how hard can it be to play? Turns out that it is very hard. I tried to teach myself to play Sweet Home Chicago and the best I could do was decide that it is played in the key of E, or maybe D, or maybe P flat. I’m just not sure. There are chords and sounds in that song which I’m now convinced only a guitar with 17 strings played by someone with 14 fingers could be played. B.B. King once said that the Blues is like southern cooking: it only has three ingredients, but the way you combine those ingredients is what makes the result great. I think Johnson was making Filet Mignon before his time. If he was on my wife’s favorite show Chopped, he could make a five star meal out of Tostitos, coffee grounds and motor oil. I’m going to try again next week when the kids are back in school. My efforts were made a little tougher this week by having Mario Kart constantly playing in the background, and me participating in it (but we we’ll disregard that part).
#1 I can predict who likes the RFRA and who doesn’t. No, really I can.
Ok, the RFRA fervor has died down a bit so maybe now cooler heads can prevail and we can figure this out as best we can. Allow me to take a moment to state that I oppose same-sex marriage but recognize that I’m probably in the minority these days and it’s a reality now for many states with more likely to come.
Let’s frame the discussion. Same-sex marriage has become legal in several states. These couples have apparently been turned away from some businesses who typically service the wedding industry because the business owners have a moral objection to participating in any way to a same-sex union. As a result, couples have claimed discrimination based upon sexual orientation and the businesses have sought legal protection against this claim. Enter the Religious Freedom Restoration Act. Indiana and Arkansas have pursued a path in favor of the business owners, but a loud outcry has caught these lawmakers by surprise and they have since backed down. However, the issue remains unresolved because we are right back where we started: same-sex couples may face discrimination and business owners may be forced to choose between moral convictions or legal concerns.
The core issue here is one’s view of homosexuality. Any person’s view of the RFRA can be accurately predicted based upon one’s understanding of homosexuality. Those who oppose the RFRA do so on the grounds that it is illegal to discriminate against a person for traits that a person is born with. In this view, homosexuality is a human trait similar to race, gender, eye color, etc. On the other hand, those who support the RFRA do so on grounds of objecting to the normalizing of homosexuality. In this view, homosexuality is a lifestyle choice. Some would call it a poor choice, even a sin (Romans 1.26, 27). So, here is the core question before us: Is homosexuality a trait from birth or a lifestyle of choice? If it is from birth then the discrimination question is settled against the RFRA. But if it is a choice issue, then no reasonable person should be forced conduct a privately-owned profitable business which provides services or products against their moral convictions. A Jewish baker should not be expected to provide Nazi-themed cakes for the Arian nation, an African-American clothier should not be required to provide uniforms for the Ku Klux Klan, and physicians are already refusing to provide treatment to children whose parents refuse to vaccinate their children. And if they are required to do so against their moral objections, is this not also discrimination against the business owner?
I believe homosexuality is a lifestyle of choice, thus not subject to the laws of discrimination, but I’m in the minority. Is a compromise possible? Yes, but not at the legal level. Business owners are prohibited from discriminating based upon traits from birth, and rightly so, but they are also prohibited from discriminating based upon other lifestyle choices such as religious views. However, we all appreciate, and even expect, that gun shop owners can restrict sales to an extremist even if religious discrimination is claimed. Private business owners should be allowed to conduct business according to moral convictions and patrons are free to take their business where they please. Honestly, do we expect that a business owner who is forced to provide products against their convictions would provide a good one? The African-American business owner could legally provide uniforms to the klan which are late, or two sizes too small, or sheer (fat white guys, yuck) so long as they entertain the business. Patrons would be better served if they take their business where they will be satisfied with the service and products, private business owners can keep their convictions intact, and no one goes to jail or to a wedding with a terrible cake.
I may have bit off more than I can chew this week. Next week promises to have less kid-centered activities involved.
See you on Monday.